CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) - Principles and Practice · Board Processes through Secretarial Standards
At Vindhya Steels Ltd, the chairperson argues that because the company secretary must report compliance to the Board and ensure compliance with secretarial standards, the chairperson and the whole-time directors are relieved of their own statutory duties on Board procedure. Which response is correct under the Companies Act, 2013?
The chairperson is wrong. Sections 204 and 205 do not affect the duties and functions of the Board, chairperson, managing director or whole-time director under the Act or any other law, so the company secretary's role supplements and does not replace their responsibilities.
- ACorrect, because sections 204 and 205 transfer all procedural duties to the company secretary
- BCorrect, but only for the managing director and not the chairperson
- CIncorrect, because sections 204 and 205 do not affect the duties and functions of the Board, chairperson, managing director or whole-time director under the Act or any other lawCorrect
- DIncorrect, because the company secretary has no role in Board procedure at all
Explanation
Section 205(2) states that sections 204 and 205 shall not affect the duties and functions of the Board, the chairperson, the managing director or a whole-time director under the Act or any other law. So the secretary's role supports, but does not displace, their duties. The option denying any secretary role contradicts section 205(1).
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Board Processes through Secretarial Standards shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Board Processes through Secretarial Standards questions
- Kaveri Textiles Ltd has a whole-time company secretary, Ms. Rao. A director asks what her statutory role is regarding secretarial standards.…
- Which meaning of 'secretarial standards' applies for the purpose of Section 205 of the Companies Act, 2013?
- Orchid Pharma Ltd's managing director argues that, since the CS reports on compliance under Section 205 and a practising CS gives a secretar…
- Orchid Steel Ltd is a listed company. Its Board, MD and chairperson are arguing about who answers for compliance with secretarial standards,…
- At Kaveri Agro Ltd, the Chairman asks the CS to skip the secretarial standards on notice of Board meetings because the directors are friendl…
- Under section 205 of the Companies Act, 2013, whose secretarial standards must a company comply with, as the Explanation to that section def…