ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Audit and Assurance (International) · Evidence and testing considerations
Auditors of Danby plc test purchase invoices for evidence of authorisation. The population has 4,000 invoices and the sample size is 80. The auditor picks a random start of 17 and then selects every nth invoice. What is the sampling interval, and what is a key risk of this method?
The interval is 50 (4,000 divided by 80). The main risk is that the population has a pattern matching the interval, which would make the sample unrepresentative and biased, so the auditor must check the population is not structured that way.
- AInterval of 50; the population may have a pattern that coincides with the interval, biasing the sampleCorrect
- BInterval of 80; the population must be sorted by value before selection
- CInterval of 50; it cannot be used for tests of controls
- DInterval of 25; it gives higher-value items a greater chance of selection
Explanation
Interval = 4,000 / 80 = 50. ISA 530 notes that with systematic selection the auditor must ensure the population is not structured so that the sampling interval corresponds to a particular pattern, otherwise the sample may be biased. The other options give wrong intervals or wrong claims; systematic selection can be used for control tests.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Evidence and testing considerations shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Evidence and testing considerations questions
- In a substantive test of receivables at Corvin Co, book value of the population is $2,000,000 and the sample tested has a book value of $400…
- Kestrel Foods plc has a year-end of 31 December. In the final review stage of the audit, the audit senior proposes performing analytical pro…
- Kestrel & Co is auditing the receivables ledger of Marlow Ltd. The auditor wants every item in the population to have a known, equal chance …
- The audit team at Delmar Foods Co is considering the sufficiency of evidence for revenue. Risk of material misstatement is assessed as high,…
- During a test of details on sales transactions at Elmcroft Co, the auditor finds one error in the sample that arose because a clerk, on one …
- Brandt & Co audits Tallis Pharma. Management's expert valued a portfolio of patents, and the auditor wants to use this work as audit evidenc…