Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Financial Management · Financial reconstruction

Brandt Co is in distress. Its going-concern value is $50m, while liquidation would realise $38m after costs. Secured creditors are owed $30m, unsecured creditors $40m and shareholders hold equity. Under a proposed reconstruction, unsecured creditors would exchange their $40m claims for 60% of the new equity, and the remaining shareholders keep 40%. Assuming the going-concern value is $50m after reconstruction and secured debt remains at $30m, what is the value of the unsecured creditors' stake and does it beat their liquidation recovery?

Post-reconstruction equity is $50m less $30m secured debt, or $20m. Unsecured creditors hold 60%, worth $12m. In liquidation only $38m minus $30m, or $8m, would be left for them. So the reconstruction gives them more than liquidation, and they should accept.

  1. A$12m, which exceeds their liquidation recovery of $8mCorrect
  2. B$12m, which is below their liquidation recovery of $8m
  3. C$20m, which exceeds their liquidation recovery of $8m
  4. D$12m, which equals their liquidation recovery of $12m

Explanation

Equity value after reconstruction = 50 - 30 = $20m. Unsecured creditors get 60% = $12m. In liquidation: 38 - 30 = $8m is available to unsecured creditors. So $12m beats $8m. Taking 60% of $50m ($30m) would ignore secured debt, and the $20m option is the whole equity.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Financial reconstruction shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Financial reconstruction questions