ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Reporting (International) · Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period
Brava plc has a 31 March 20X6 year end and the financial statements were authorised on 20 June 20X6. On 15 May 20X6 a fire destroyed a warehouse holding inventory carried at $2.5 million, which was not insured. Which treatment is correct under IAS 10?
No adjustment is made, but the nature of the fire and an estimate of its financial effect must be disclosed. The fire occurred after the reporting date and did not reflect conditions at year end, so it is a material non-adjusting event under IAS 10.
- AAdjust inventory to nil in the 20X6 statements because the loss is material
- BMake no adjustment, but disclose the nature of the event and an estimate of its financial effectCorrect
- CMake no adjustment and no disclosure because it arose after the year end
- DRecognise a provision at 31 March 20X6 for the expected loss
Explanation
The fire arose after the reporting date from conditions that did not exist at 31 March, so it is non-adjusting. Because it is material, IAS 10 requires disclosure of its nature and an estimate of the financial effect. Recognising a provision would create a liability that did not exist at the reporting date.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period questions
- Delta plc's finance director asks the group accountant to omit a restructuring provision for a division the board has publicly announced it …
- Kestrel Group has a 31 December 20X5 year end, with statements authorised on 28 March 20X6. Kestrel's subsidiary, Sparrow Ltd, ceased to be …
- Glenfield Co has a reporting date of 31 December 20X5 and its financial statements were authorised for issue on 15 March 20X6. On 20 Februar…
- Ordell Co sells goods with a warranty. Past experience suggests that of goods sold, 80% will have no defects, 15% will have minor defects co…
- Kestrel Ltd is defending a claim for damages brought by a customer. Kestrel's lawyers advise that it is possible, but less likely than not, …
- Marlow Group has a year end of 30 June 20X6 and the financial statements were authorised on 10 September 20X6. On 5 August 20X6 the board de…