ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Audit and Assurance (International) · Professional appointments
Brightwell & Co is tendering for the audit of Kora Foods plc. The tender partner proposes to quote a fee of 40% of the previous auditor's fee to win the work, noting that the firm expects to sell consulting services to Kora later. Which statement best reflects the IESBA Code?
A low fee is not prohibited in itself, but it creates a self-interest threat to professional competence and due care. The firm must be satisfied it can still perform the audit to professional standards, with adequate time and skilled staff, and apply safeguards where needed.
- ALow fees are never permitted because the Code sets a minimum audit fee
- BA low fee is acceptable provided the firm discloses it in the audit report
- CQuoting a low fee is not prohibited in itself, but the firm must ensure it can perform the audit in accordance with professional standards and that the fee does not create a self-interest threat to qualityCorrect
- DA low fee is acceptable because cross-selling revenue removes any threat to objectivity
Explanation
The Code does not set minimum fees and permits the firm to quote what it likes, but a significantly low fee creates a self-interest threat to compliance with professional standards. The firm must be able to allocate adequate time and skilled staff and apply safeguards. Cross-selling expectations increase, not remove, the threat.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Professional appointments shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Professional appointments questions
- Larch & Partners tenders for the audit of Orion plc and offers a fee well below that of the previous auditor, to win the work. The partner s…
- Tamsin & Co has tendered successfully and been appointed auditor of Oakfield Ltd. Which action best reflects good practice before accepting …
- Dunmore & Partners is considering continuing as auditor of Calder Foods plc. During the year, the finance director was found to have deliber…
- Marlowe LLP is considering accepting appointment as auditor of Tidewater Ltd. Before accepting, Marlowe's partner learns that Tidewater's pr…
- Tarn & Co is the auditor of Lowell Ltd. The directors tell Tarn & Co they intend to propose its removal because it has challenged the revenu…
- Fenwick & Co audits Orion Mining Ltd. During continuance review, the firm notes that Orion Mining Ltd has begun operating in a jurisdiction …