CA Final · Integrated Business Solutions (Multidisciplinary Case Study with Strategic Management) · Corporate and Economic Laws
Case: Vihaan Steels Ltd, a public company, had Rs 10 crore paid-up capital and a creditor, Orbit Metals, owed Rs 3 crore. Vihaan's bank, Nation Bank, holds a secured loan of Rs 20 crore and Orbit is an operational creditor. Vihaan is being assessed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Orbit issued a demand notice for the unpaid invoice of Rs 3 crore, and Vihaan did not reply within 10 days nor pay. Vihaan had earlier received a notice from a customer about a pre-existing dispute that was pending in arbitration over the same invoice quality. What is the likely position on Orbit's application under Section 9?
Orbit's Section 9 application is likely to be rejected if a genuine pre-existing dispute over the same invoice is shown. Silence after the demand notice does not override documents proving a dispute existed earlier, because the tribunal looks at whether a real dispute exists, not merely whether the debtor replied.
- AIt will be admitted because default exceeds the threshold and Vihaan did not reply
- BIt will be rejected if a pre-existing dispute is established, as the corporate debtor's silence to the demand notice does not defeat records showing dispute existed before the noticeCorrect
- CIt is automatically admitted since operational creditors can always trigger CIRP
- DIt must be converted into a financial creditor application
Explanation
For operational creditors, the adjudicating authority examines whether a pre-existing dispute exists; if records show a genuine dispute that predates the demand notice, the application is rejected. Failing to reply within 10 days is not conclusive when such a dispute is evidenced. The dispute here concerns the same invoice quality and is pending in arbitration. A creditor cannot convert status by choice.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Corporate and Economic Laws shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Corporate and Economic Laws questions
- Case: Orion Steels Ltd, a company with a Rs 500 crore turnover, also has a related Competition Commission inquiry. Orion holds a 70% market …
- Case: Rohini Pharma Ltd, an Indian company, has a foreign promoter, Helix GmbH, holding 60%. Rohini plans to acquire 30% of a Singapore phar…
- Case: Sapphire Exports Pvt Ltd (India) exported goods worth USD 200,000 on 1 April. The invoice is payable within the period permitted under…
- Case: Meridian Textiles Ltd, a listed company, has a board of 9 directors. Its Managing Director Mr Arvind Rao is appointed for 5 years. The…
- Case: Lotus Retail Ltd, a listed company, finds that Mr. Verma, its chief financial officer, sold shares just before the company announced a…
- Case: Ganga Steel Ltd's auditor, while auditing the accounts, has reason to believe that an offence involving fraud of Rs 2 crore is being c…