Skip to content

CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Warehousing

Chitra Enterprises warehoused goods under a bond executed under section 59 and later moved all of them to another warehouse. Rohan Ltd then bought part of the goods while they remained in bond, and the part was transferred to Rohan Ltd. Which statement is correct under the Customs Act, 1962?

Chitra's bond continues in force despite the move to another warehouse. Rohan Ltd, as transferee of part of the goods, must execute its own bond in the manner of section 59(1) or (2) and also furnish the prescribed security.

  1. AChitra's bond ceases on transfer to another warehouse, and Rohan need not execute any bond
  2. BChitra's bond continues despite the transfer to another warehouse, and Rohan Ltd must execute its own bond and furnish security for the part transferred to itCorrect
  3. CRohan Ltd need only furnish security, with no bond
  4. DOnly the warehouse keeper must execute a bond for the transferred part

Explanation

Section 59(4) keeps the bond in force notwithstanding transfer to another warehouse. Under section 59(5), a transferee of whole or part of the goods must execute a bond as in sub-section (1) or (2) and furnish security under sub-section (3).

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Warehousing shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Warehousing questions