Skip to content

NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-XV: Research Analyst · Company Analysis - Business and Governance

Company A (Rs 800 crore net worth) has promoter-related loans and advances of Rs 120 crore given to group entities, and cash flow from operations of Rs 150 crore against reported profit after tax of Rs 300 crore, with receivables rising sharply. Which analyst conclusion is most appropriate?

Earnings quality and capital allocation are questionable. Operating cash flow of Rs 150 crore is only 50% of PAT of Rs 300 crore, receivables are rising, and Rs 120 crore, about 15% of net worth, has gone to related group entities, which signals governance concerns.

  1. AEarnings quality and capital allocation are questionable, since cash conversion is only 50% of PAT and funds flow to related partiesCorrect
  2. BEarnings quality is strong because PAT is high
  3. CGovernance is strong because loans to group entities are 15% of net worth
  4. DCash conversion is 200% of PAT, indicating conservative accounting

Explanation

Cash conversion is CFO/PAT = 150/300 = 50%, which is weak, and rising receivables suggest profits are not being collected. Rs 120 crore of related party loans is 15% of net worth, which is a governance concern rather than a positive. Option 4 inverts the ratio (300/150 = 200%).

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Company Analysis - Business and Governance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

Practise Company Analysis - Business and GovernanceFree diagnostic mock

More Company Analysis - Business and Governance questions