CFA Level I · CFA Level I Exam · Simulation of Financial Asset Prices and Returns
Compared with analytical valuation formulas, Monte Carlo simulation is most likely preferred for pricing an option whose payoff:
Monte Carlo is most useful when the payoff depends on the full price path, as with Asian or barrier options. Such products often lack closed-form formulas, while linear or terminal-price-only payoffs can usually be valued analytically.
- Adepends on the full path of the underlying priceCorrect
- Bdepends only on the terminal price of the underlying
- Cis a simple linear function of the underlying price
Explanation
Path-dependent payoffs, such as Asian or barrier options, often lack closed-form solutions, so simulating many price paths is useful. Simple or terminal-price-only payoffs often have analytical solutions.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Simulation of Financial Asset Prices and Returns shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Simulation of Financial Asset Prices and Returns questions
- An analyst simulates future prices of a stock by assuming that continuously compounded returns are normally distributed. Compared with simul…
- A Monte Carlo simulation of 10,000 trials gives a sample standard deviation of present value of EUR 40 million for a project. The estimated …
- An analyst wants to estimate the value of a path-dependent exotic option whose payoff depends on the average price of the underlying over it…
- Which statement best describes why an analyst might simulate asset prices using a lognormal model rather than directly modeling prices as no…
- A Monte Carlo simulation models a stock's one-year continuously compounded return as normal with mean 8% and standard deviation 20%. The cur…
- A Monte Carlo analyst increases the number of simulated price paths from 1,000 to 4,000, holding all else constant. The standard error of th…