CFA Level I · CFA Level I Exam · Statistical Distributions for Financial Asset Prices and Returns
Compared with historical simulation, Monte Carlo simulation is most likely to:
Monte Carlo simulation lets the analyst change the assumed probability distributions and parameters, for example to test different volatilities or correlations. Historical simulation relies on observed past returns instead. Monte Carlo results are only as good as the model assumptions, so accuracy is never guaranteed.
- Arely on observed past returns
- Ballow assumed distributions to be changedCorrect
- Cguarantee accurate results
Explanation
Monte Carlo draws from distributions chosen by the analyst, so assumptions such as volatility or correlation can be altered to explore scenarios. Historical simulation uses actual past returns. Neither method guarantees accuracy, because Monte Carlo results depend on the assumptions and the model.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Statistical Distributions for Financial Asset Prices and Returns shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Statistical Distributions for Financial Asset Prices and Returns questions
- Compared with the standard normal distribution, a Student's t-distribution with 10 degrees of freedom is most accurately described as having…
- Which of the following random variables is most likely best modeled as a discrete random variable?
- Which statement about the continuous uniform distribution is most accurate?
- An analyst models the price of a share as lognormally distributed. Which statement about the distribution of the share price is most accurat…
- A portfolio has an expected annual return of 9% and a standard deviation of 12%. The investor's minimum acceptable return is 3%. The portfol…
- A portfolio manager's monthly returns are normally distributed with a mean of 1.0% and a standard deviation of 4.0%. The z-score for a month…