CS Professional · Compliance Management, Audit and Due Diligence · Legal Framework Governing Company Secretaries
CS Rohan Mehta, an associate member of the Institute, has not obtained a certificate of practice from the Council. He puts up a signboard in Pune describing himself as a practising Company Secretary and begins certifying documents for clients. Which statement correctly describes his position under the Company Secretaries Act, 1980?
Rohan cannot practise because a member needs a certificate of practice from the Council. By holding himself out as in practice without one, he attracts the penalty in section 24(b) of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980. Membership alone gives no right to practise.
- AHe is allowed to practise because membership of the Institute alone gives the right to practise
- BHe is not entitled to practise and, by representing that he is in practice, becomes liable to punishment under section 24Correct
- CHe may practise in India but not elsewhere without a certificate
- DHe may practise provided he pays the annual fee before 1 April of the following year
Explanation
Section 6(1) bars a member from practising unless he has obtained a certificate of practice from the Council. Section 24(b) punishes a member without such a certificate who represents that he is in practice or practises. Membership alone is not enough, so the first option is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Legal Framework Governing Company Secretaries shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Legal Framework Governing Company Secretaries questions
- A suit filed by the dissolved company before 1980 was pending when the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 commenced. A defendant argues that it a…
- Kiran & Co LLP, which has a private limited company as one of its two partners, starts offering Company Secretary practice services. Is Sect…
- The Director (Discipline) receives information about conduct of CS Rohit Sharma that is not described in any Schedule, but which appears to …
- A firm, 'Mehta & Associates', has three partners, all members of the Institute and all in practice. The partners want the firm to be known a…
- A complainant against CS Neha Iyer, having filed a complaint with fee, writes to the Director (Discipline) withdrawing it while the case is …
- Three partners, Anil, Bina and Chetan, run a firm. Anil and Bina are members of the Institute in practice, but Chetan is a chartered account…