CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 111 Joint Arrangements
Delta Ltd is preparing a note on differences between Ind AS 111 and IFRS 11. Which statement about paragraph B33D in Ind AS 111 is correct?
Paragraph B33D refers to Appendix C of Ind AS 103 for acquiring an interest in a joint operation when the parties sharing joint control are under the same ultimate controlling party both before and after the acquisition and that control is not transitory. IFRS 11 scopes this out.
- AIt requires acquisitions of joint operation interests to be measured at fair value even under common control
- BIt refers to Appendix C of Ind AS 103 for acquiring an interest in a joint operation when the parties sharing joint control are under the same ultimate controlling party both before and after, and the control is not transitoryCorrect
- CIt exempts all joint operations from the requirements of Ind AS 103
- DIt was deleted in Ind AS 111 as it conflicts with Ind AS 110
Explanation
The comparison with IFRS 11 notes that B33D refers to the accounting in Appendix C of Ind AS 103 for common-control business combinations. This applies when parties sharing joint control, including the acquirer, are under common control of the same ultimate controlling party both before and after, and that control is not transitory. IFRS 11 scopes this out because IFRS 3 does not deal with common control. Option A is therefore wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 111 Joint Arrangements shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 111 Joint Arrangements questions
- Veda Infra Ltd and Kiran Builders Ltd sign a contractual arrangement to build a toll road. Decisions on relevant activities need unanimous c…
- A student preparing Ind AS 111 notes writes four statements on its comparison with IFRS 11. Which statement reflects the difference describe…
- Meridian Infra Ltd and Sahyadri Power Ltd have signed a contractual arrangement under which both parties have joint control over a hydro pro…
- Eka Ltd is a party to an arrangement with Fino Ltd. The contract gives both parties unanimous control over relevant activities. A finance ma…
- Kaveri Ltd holds an interest in an arrangement that falls outside the scope of Ind AS 111 because the parties do not have joint control. How…
- Kaveri Textiles Ltd holds a 50% interest in an arrangement that its advisers have concluded is outside the scope of Ind AS 111 because no jo…