ACCA Applied Skills · Performance Management · Relevant cost analysis
Delta Ltd needs 10,000 units of a part. Making them costs $8 variable per unit plus fixed costs of $30,000 that are avoidable only if Delta buys. A supplier quotes $10.50 per unit. What is the financial effect of buying instead of making?
Buying saves $5,000. Making costs $110,000 (variable $80,000 plus avoidable fixed $30,000), while buying costs $105,000. Because the fixed costs are avoidable when buying, they are relevant and must be included in the comparison.
- A$5,000 savingCorrect
- B$5,000 extra cost
- C$25,000 extra cost
- D$30,000 saving
Explanation
Make cost = 10,000 x $8 + $30,000 = $110,000. Buy cost = 10,000 x $10.50 = $105,000. Buying saves $5,000. Ignoring the avoidable fixed costs would wrongly show a $25,000 extra cost for buying.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Relevant cost analysis shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Relevant cost analysis questions
- Ridge Co makes component Z internally at a variable cost of $14 per unit and allocates fixed overheads of $6 per unit, of which only 40% wou…
- Cobalt Co is considering stopping Product P, which has sales of $90,000, variable costs of $60,000, directly attributable avoidable fixed co…
- Zeta Co is considering a special order that needs 400 kg of Material X. Zeta holds 500 kg of X in inventory, bought for $6 per kg. X is regu…
- Which of the following is a relevant cost for a decision on whether to accept a special order?
- Dalton Co is pricing a one-off contract. Which of the following overhead items is relevant to the decision?
- Which of the following is a qualitative factor that favours outsourcing a service rather than providing it in-house?