CS Professional · Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Corporate Tax Planning · Value of Supply
Desai Foods sells products to Nair Stores for Rs 1,00,000. Desai also receives a Rs 10,000 subsidy from a private trust, directly linked to the price of this supply. Desai separately receives Rs 15,000 from the State Government as a subsidy linked to the price of the same supply. Considering only these facts, what is the value of Desai's supply?
The value is Rs 1,10,000. Section 15(2)(e) includes price-linked subsidies except those given by the Central or State Governments, so the private trust's Rs 10,000 is added while the State Government's Rs 15,000 is left out.
- ARs 1,25,000
- BRs 1,10,000Correct
- CRs 1,15,000
- DRs 1,00,000
Explanation
Under section 15(2)(e), subsidies directly linked to price are included, but subsidies provided by the Central or State Governments are excluded. The private trust's Rs 10,000 is included; the State Government's Rs 15,000 is excluded. Value = 1,00,000 + 10,000 = Rs 1,10,000.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Value of Supply shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Value of Supply questions
- Mehta Ltd supplies goods to Nair Ltd, an unrelated buyer, for Rs 2,00,000. Without any prior agreement, after the supply Mehta Ltd issues a …
- Sharma Traders Pvt Ltd sells machinery to an unrelated buyer for Rs 5,00,000 and separately charges Rs 20,000 as State-levied cess under a n…
- Under the Explanation to Section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017, which of the following pairs is deemed to be 'related persons' for valuation purp…
- Ananya Traders supplies machinery to Kiran Enterprises for a price of Rs 2,00,000. Ananya separately charges Rs 10,000 as customs-type duty …
- A manufacturer in Pune sells goods to an unrelated dealer for a list price of ₹1,00,000. The tax invoice itself shows a trade discount of ₹5…
- Under the Explanation to Section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017, which of the following pairs of persons is deemed to be 'related persons'?