Skip to content

CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · Audit of Banks

During a bank audit, CA Vivek notices that a bank has granted a ₹5 crore loan to a company in which the bank's chairman is a director, at interest below the bank's prevailing rate, with no board approval recorded. Considering the auditor's duties, which response is most appropriate?

The auditor should treat it as a related party transaction, gather evidence on approvals and terms, assess compliance with law and RBI directions, and communicate and report as required. Regular repayment does not cure a possible non-compliance, and silent settlement or exclusion from testing is inappropriate.

  1. ATreat it as a normal advance because the loan is regular in repayment
  2. BEvaluate the transaction as a related party matter, obtain evidence of approvals and terms, assess compliance with applicable law and RBI directions, and report/disclose as required including in the audit report or to those charged with governanceCorrect
  3. CExclude the loan from sample testing since it is an insider exposure
  4. DAdvise the chairman to repay and say nothing in the audit report

Explanation

Under SA 550 and the Companies Act and banking regulation provisions on loans to directors and related entities, the auditor must examine approvals, terms and disclosure. Communication to those charged with governance and reporting follow. Ignoring or privately settling the issue would be wrong; being regular in repayment does not remove the compliance concern.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Audit of Banks shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Audit of Banks questions