CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Art of Advocacy and Appearances
During a hearing, the presiding member puts a pointed question to the company secretary representing Arvind Textiles Ltd, and the answer would partly weaken the client's case. What is the most appropriate advocacy conduct?
The appropriate conduct is to answer the question candidly and then explain why the case still deserves relief. Honesty to the forum preserves the advocate's credibility, whereas evasion or a misleading reply harms the client and the profession.
- AAnswer candidly and then explain why the case still merits the relief soughtCorrect
- BIgnore the question and continue with the prepared argument
- CGive a misleading answer to protect the client's position
- DRequest the bench to put the question in writing and refuse to answer orally
Explanation
An advocate owes a duty of honesty to the forum. Answering candidly and then showing why the case still stands preserves credibility. Evasion or misleading answers damage the advocate's standing and may amount to misconduct.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Art of Advocacy and Appearances shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Art of Advocacy and Appearances questions
- A Section 8 company's matter under the Companies Act, 1956 was pending before the Company Law Board immediately before the date notified by …
- Mr. Iyer, a company secretary, is to argue a company petition. Which preparation step best reflects the essential skill of mastering the fac…
- A Section 8 company, Shiksha Sewa Foundation, authorises Kavita by a resolution of its Board to act as its representative at a general meeti…
- Verma Pharma Ltd. is applying to the Tribunal for approval to revise its financial statements for an earlier year under Section 131. The com…
- A Tribunal has ordered winding up of Orchid Textiles Ltd. and directed its former director, Mr. Rajan, to be examined on the Company Liquida…
- Aarogya Seva Ltd, a Section 8 company, missed the sixty-day period for appealing a Company Law Board order, being prevented by sufficient ca…