ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Audit and Assurance (International) · Group audits
During acceptance of Brightwater Group, the engagement team learns that management of a significant overseas subsidiary, Norvik Ltd, is restricted by local law from allowing the group team or component auditor to access certain records. The group engagement partner concludes the restriction is likely to result in a limitation on scope of the group audit that cannot be overcome. What is the most appropriate response under ISA 600 (Revised) at the acceptance stage?
The firm should not accept the engagement if an uncircumventable restriction at a significant component is likely to lead to a disclaimer of opinion, unless law requires acceptance. Deferring the issue, excluding the subsidiary or relying on representations would not provide sufficient appropriate evidence.
- AAccept the engagement and issue a modified opinion only if the limitation is found material at year end
- BAccept the engagement but exclude Norvik Ltd from the group financial statements
- CNot accept the engagement as group auditor if it is expected that the limitation will lead to a disclaimer of opinion, unless required by law to acceptCorrect
- DAccept and rely on the parent's management representation about Norvik Ltd instead of audit evidence
Explanation
If the group engagement partner concludes it will not be possible to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence and the possible effect is likely to result in a disclaimer of opinion, the engagement should not be accepted (or the appointment should be withdrawn from where permitted), unless law requires acceptance. Excluding the component from the consolidation would misstate the financial statements, and management representations do not replace evidence.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Group audits shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Group audits questions
- Under ISA 600 (Revised), the group auditor has set group materiality of $2m. How should the group auditor set the materiality for a componen…
- Harlow & Co is considering appointment as group auditor of Verity Group, which has a parent and six subsidiaries. Two subsidiaries are audit…
- Kestrel Group has group financial statements materiality of $2,000,000 and group performance materiality of $1,500,000. The group team sets …
- Zephyr Group has a component in Brazil that is financially significant to the group. The component auditor has been instructed to audit the …
- Quill Group's auditor is scoping the audit. Component B is only 4% of group profit before tax, but it operates a trading desk in derivatives…
- Tamsin Reeve is engagement partner for Orchid Group. Component auditor Delmar LLP audits a subsidiary in another jurisdiction and will perfo…