Skip to content

CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · Audit of Items of Financial Statements

During the audit of Sundaram Pharma Ltd, the auditor selects a sample of trade receivables for external confirmation. Management requests that the auditor not confirm the balance of Hari Distributors, a large debtor, stating that the party is in dispute and confirmation would damage the relationship. What should the auditor do first?

The auditor should first inquire into management's reasons and gather evidence on whether they are valid and reasonable. If the refusal is justified, alternative procedures such as examining subsequent receipts and invoices are performed. Simply dropping the confirmation or withdrawing immediately is not the prescribed response under SA 505.

  1. AAccept the request, since management knows its customers best, and drop the confirmation without further action
  2. BInquire into management's reasons and seek audit evidence on their validity and reasonableness, then perform alternative procedures if the refusal is justifiedCorrect
  3. CTreat the balance as fraudulently stated and withdraw from the engagement
  4. DConfirm the balance with the debtor anyway without informing management or the governance body

Explanation

Under SA 505, if management refuses to allow a confirmation request, the auditor inquires about the reasons and seeks evidence on their validity. If the refusal is reasonable, alternative procedures such as subsequent receipts and invoices are performed. Accepting blindly is wrong, and withdrawal is not the first step. If the refusal is unreasonable, the auditor evaluates the implications for risk of material misstatement and communicates with those charged with governance.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Audit of Items of Financial Statements shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Audit of Items of Financial Statements questions