ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Reporting (International) · Non-current assets
Elm plc plans to sell its 70% subsidiary Fir, and the criteria for held for sale are met at the reporting date. Elm intends to sell only a 30% interest, which will reduce its holding to 40% and result in significant influence but loss of control. Fir's net assets in the group accounts are $2,000,000 and goodwill is $200,000, with no non-controlling interest adjustments needed beyond that. Which statement is correct?
All of Fir's assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale. Under IFRS 5, a plan to lose control of a subsidiary triggers classification of the entire subsidiary as a disposal group, even if the parent keeps a non-controlling interest such as an associate stake afterwards.
- AOnly the 30% to be sold is classified as held for sale, and Fir is still consolidated line by line
- BFir is not held for sale because Elm will retain an interest in it
- CAll of Fir's assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale, because loss of control is planned, even though an interest is retainedCorrect
- DFir's assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale only to the extent of goodwill of $200,000
Explanation
IFRS 5 applies when a plan involves loss of control of a subsidiary, and all of that subsidiary's assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale, regardless of any retained interest. Partial classification is not allowed, so the first and fourth options are wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Non-current assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Non-current assets questions
- Elm Co, a listed entity, holds land for which management has not determined any future use. The finance director suggests classifying it as …
- Omega Group's parent borrowed $20m at 7% to fund general purposes. During the year, a subsidiary constructed a qualifying asset using only f…
- Amber Co receives a government grant of $600,000 towards the cost of a machine costing $2,000,000 with a 10-year useful life and no residual…
- Karel Co incurred the following costs in the year: $120,000 on research into a new process, $90,000 on staff training for the new process, a…
- Halden Co acquired a brand with an indefinite useful life in a business combination, fair valued at $5m. Two years later the directors, unde…
- Elm Co's finance director proposes to recognise a $1,000,000 government grant as income in full in the current year, although the grant is c…