Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Empirical Properties of Correlation: How Do Correlations Behave in the Real World?

Equity correlations are estimated in two regimes. A risk manager finds that the average correlation is substantially higher when markets fall than when they rise by a similar magnitude. What is the most appropriate implication for VaR computed with a single constant correlation matrix estimated over a full sample?

A single full-sample correlation matrix may understate portfolio risk in downturns. It blends calm-period and stressed-period correlations, so it is lower than the correlations actually seen in sell-offs. The result is too much assumed diversification and a VaR that is too low when it matters most.

  1. AIt may understate portfolio risk in downturns because it blends calm and stressed correlationsCorrect
  2. BIt will overstate risk in all market conditions
  3. CIt is unbiased because average correlation equals the true correlation in every regime
  4. DIt affects only expected shortfall, not VaR

Explanation

A full-sample correlation averages regimes, so it is lower than the stressed correlation seen in sell-offs. Using it in a downturn understates co-movement and thus portfolio VaR for long-only positions. It is not unbiased conditionally, and VaR is affected too.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Empirical Properties of Correlation: How Do Correlations Behave in the Real World? shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Empirical Properties of Correlation: How Do Correlations Behave in the Real World? questions