CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement
Farhan Motors is sued for infringement of a patent. The patentee earlier obtained a High Court certificate under section 113 that the validity of the claim was contested and upheld. Farhan Motors again disputes the claim's validity, and the patentee wins the suit. What is the costs position?
The patentee is entitled to full costs concerning the certified claim unless the court directs otherwise. The only statutory exception is for a party who was unaware of the certificate and withdrew the validity defence immediately upon learning of it.
- AEach party bears its own costs, since certificates affect only validity
- BThe patentee is entitled to full costs relating to that claim unless the court directs otherwise, subject to the proviso for a party unaware of the certificate who withdrew the defence at onceCorrect
- CThe patentee is entitled to full costs without exception
- DThe patentee gets costs only if Farhan Motors knew of the certificate
Explanation
Section 113(2) entitles the patentee, on a final order in his favour in a subsequent suit, to full costs for that claim unless the court otherwise directs. The proviso denies such costs only to a party who was unaware of the certificate and withdrew the defence forthwith on learning of it. So 'without exception' is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement questions
- Meera Textiles Pvt Ltd files a patent application in Chennai for a new dyeing process. Two years later she realises nobody has asked for exa…
- A patent was granted to Rohan Textiles and its grant was published on 10 January 2026. On 15 November 2026, Meera Dyes, a person interested,…
- Veda Pharma sues Kiran Labs for infringing its process patent. Kiran Labs, in its written statement, argues that the patent is liable to be …
- Veda Pharma Ltd sues Kiran Labs for infringing its process patent. Kiran Labs argues that the patent is liable to be revoked on one of the g…
- Dev Agro filed an application and the applicant made no request for examination within the prescribed period; no secrecy direction was issue…
- Rohan Pharma Pvt Ltd filed a patent application. A competitor, Sanjay Labs, which is an interested person and not the applicant, wants the a…