CS Professional · Banking and Insurance - Laws and Practice · Functions in Insurance and Compliance related thereto (Part I)
Following IRDAI findings of deliberate stalling of claims, the Authority, for reasons recorded in writing, orders the removal of Mr. Rao, CEO of an insurer, to protect policyholders. Which statement is correct under the Insurance Act, 1938 as reproduced?
Mr. Rao must first be given a reasonable opportunity to make a representation, and after removal he cannot claim compensation for loss or termination of office, notwithstanding any contract or articles. He is also barred from managing any insurer for up to five years.
- AMr. Rao can claim compensation for loss of office under his contract
- BMr. Rao must be given a reasonable opportunity to make a representation before the order, and cannot claim compensation for loss of officeCorrect
- CMr. Rao may continue in management of other insurers immediately after removal
- DThe Authority cannot appoint a replacement without the insurer's shareholders' consent
Explanation
Section 34B(2) requires a reasonable opportunity of representation before the removal order, and 34B(7) bars compensation for loss or termination of office despite any contract. Under 34B(3) he is barred from managing any insurer for up to five years, and 34B(5) lets the Authority appoint a replacement.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Functions in Insurance and Compliance related thereto (Part I) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Functions in Insurance and Compliance related thereto (Part I) questions
- Bharat Assurance Ltd has a valuation surplus of ₹60 crore. It intends to service its debentures from this surplus, with no offset of interes…
- An insurer carrying on general insurance business pays excessive commission to its distributors and expenses are rising. Which action falls …
- Himalaya Life Ltd's actuarial valuation discloses a surplus of ₹40 crore on participating policies. Under the second proviso to Section 49(1…
- Kaveri Life Ltd proposes a scheme where the benefit under a policy is not fixed but depends on how sums are distributed among policies that …
- The IRDAI believes a life insurer, Himalaya Life Ltd, is acting in a manner likely to prejudice life policyholders. Under Section 52A, what …
- A general insurer, Bharat Shield General Insurance, repeatedly repudiates motor claims on weak grounds. Under the Insurance Act, 1938 as rep…