IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis · Estimation procedures for lifetime distributions
For a group of lives aged x, the observed central exposed to risk is 2,000 person-years with 50 deaths, and the force of mortality is assumed constant over the year. The estimate of q_x is closest to:
With a constant force, the estimated force is 50 divided by 2,000, which is 0.025. The probability of death is then one minus e to the power of minus 0.025, which is about 0.0247, slightly below the force itself.
- A0.0250
- B0.0247Correct
- C0.0253
- D0.0500
- 0.0125
Explanation
Constant force: mu-hat = 50/2000 = 0.025. Then q_x = 1 − e^(−0.025) = 1 − 0.97531 = 0.02469, about 0.0247. Option 1 equates q with mu directly, ignoring the exponential. Option 3 would be wrongly using mu/(1−mu/2), which is not exact under a constant force.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Estimation procedures for lifetime distributions shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Estimation procedures for lifetime distributions questions
- In a study of lifetimes of policyholders in a pension scheme, an individual is observed from entry until the study ends, at which point the …
- In the Cox proportional hazards model h(t; z) = h0(t) exp(β'z), which feature of the model is left unspecified when β is estimated by partia…
- In a study of policyholder lifetimes, the Kaplan-Meier estimator of the survival function is computed. Which statement about the estimator i…
- In a Kaplan-Meier analysis, the largest observation is a right-censored time. What is true of the estimate beyond that time?
- Lives enter a study at various ages and are observed until death or censoring. For a life entering at age 50 who is censored at age 58 (no d…
- In a Cox model fitted by partial likelihood, which statement about the baseline hazard h0(t) is correct?