NISM Certifications · NISM-Series-V-A: Mutual Fund Distributors · Risk, Return and Performance of Funds
Fund A and Fund B both have a Treynor-based comparison over the same period. Fund A: return 15%, beta 1.5; Fund B: return 12%, beta 0.8. The risk-free rate is 6%. Which statement is correct?
Fund B has the higher Treynor ratio. Fund A scores (15−6)/1.5 = 6%, while Fund B scores (12−6)/0.8 = 7.5%. Fund B therefore earns more excess return per unit of systematic risk, despite Fund A's higher absolute return.
- AFund B has the higher Treynor ratio, 7.5% against 6% for Fund ACorrect
- BFund A has the higher Treynor ratio, 10% against 7.5%
- CBoth funds have the same Treynor ratio
- DFund A has a Treynor ratio of 6% and Fund B of 9%
Explanation
Treynor ratio = (Return − Risk-free)/Beta. Fund A = (15−6)/1.5 = 6.0. Fund B = (12−6)/0.8 = 7.5. So Fund B gives more excess return per unit of systematic risk, even though Fund A has the higher raw return. Dividing by return instead of beta or omitting the risk-free rate produces the wrong figures in the other options.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk, Return and Performance of Funds shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Risk, Return and Performance of Funds questions
- A fund earned a return of 14% in a year. The risk-free rate is 6%, the fund's standard deviation is 16% and its beta is 0.8. What is the fun…
- A scheme has a beta of 1.2 relative to its benchmark. If the benchmark rises by 10%, what is the scheme's expected movement, all else equal?
- Fund A has a standard deviation of 18% and Fund B has a standard deviation of 12%, both over the same period and with similar objectives. Wh…
- A scheme has a beta of 1.2. If the market index falls by 10%, what fall would be expected in the scheme's value, based on beta alone?
- A scheme returned 18% in a year while its benchmark index returned 15%. Its beta relative to the benchmark is 1.2. What does a beta of 1.2 i…
- Which of the following is true about the Treynor ratio used to evaluate mutual fund schemes?