CA Intermediate · Advanced Accounting · AS 29 (Revised) Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Godavari Infra Ltd. has the following items at the year end. (i) A lawsuit by a supplier claiming Rs 40 lakh; lawyers advise it is more likely than not that the company will lose, and the best estimate of the loss is Rs 30 lakh. (ii) A guarantee given for a subsidiary's loan of Rs 25 lakh; the subsidiary is financially sound and default is remote. (iii) A claim filed by the company against a customer for Rs 18 lakh; recovery is virtually certain and an Rs 15 lakh settlement has been agreed in writing after the year end but before approval of accounts, confirming conditions existing at the balance sheet date. What amount should be recognised as a provision/liability and as an asset in the books, respectively?
Provision of Rs 30 lakh and asset of Rs 15 lakh. The lawsuit is a probable outflow with a best estimate of Rs 30 lakh. The guarantee is remote, so nothing is recorded. The claim recovery is virtually certain at Rs 15 lakh, so it is no longer a contingent asset.
- AProvision Rs 30 lakh; asset Rs 15 lakhCorrect
- BProvision Rs 55 lakh; asset Rs 15 lakh
- CProvision Rs 30 lakh; asset nil
- DProvision Rs 40 lakh; asset Rs 18 lakh
Explanation
(i) Present obligation, outflow probable, best estimate Rs 30 lakh, so provide Rs 30 lakh. (ii) Remote, so no provision or disclosure needed. (iii) Recovery is virtually certain and it is no longer contingent, so an asset of the best estimate Rs 15 lakh is recognised. Adding the guarantee (Rs 55 lakh) is wrong as the outflow is remote; nil asset wrongly treats it as a contingent asset.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on AS 29 (Revised) Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More AS 29 (Revised) Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets questions
- Kaveri Engineering Ltd. sells 2,000 machines in a year with a warranty. Past experience: 80% will have no defects, 15% will have minor defec…
- Meenakshi Chemicals Ltd. has an onerous contract to supply 10,000 units at Rs 120 per unit. Unavoidable cost of fulfilling it is Rs 135 per …
- Mehta Chemicals Ltd. has a contract that has become onerous. Unavoidable cost of meeting its obligations is Rs 18,50,000, while the economic…
- Kaveri Appliances Ltd. sells goods with a one-year warranty. Based on past experience, for the year ended 31 March 2026, sales were Rs 8,00,…
- Mahesh Pharma Ltd. is claiming Rs 25 lakh from an insurer for a fire damage to a godown, and the insurer has disputed the claim. At 31 March…
- Shree Textiles Ltd. sold goods in March 2026 under a warranty to repair defects arising within one year. Past experience shows that 90% of g…