CMA Foundation · Fundamentals of Financial and Cost Accounting · Capital and Revenue Transactions
Gupta & Sons paid Rs 30,000 as legal fees: Rs 18,000 for drafting the conveyance deed on purchase of a godown and Rs 12,000 for defending a customer's suit over a trade debt. Which treatment is correct?
Rs 18,000 for the conveyance deed is capital expenditure because it is part of acquiring the godown, whereas Rs 12,000 for defending a trade debt suit is revenue expenditure charged to the Profit and Loss Account.
- ARs 18,000 capital expenditure and Rs 12,000 revenue expenditureCorrect
- BRs 30,000 capital expenditure
- CRs 30,000 revenue expenditure
- DRs 12,000 capital expenditure and Rs 18,000 revenue expenditure
Explanation
Legal charges for acquiring property are part of the asset's cost, so Rs 18,000 is capitalised. Legal expenses for a routine trading dispute are revenue expenditure, so Rs 12,000 goes to the Profit and Loss Account. Treating all as capital would overstate the godown.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Capital and Revenue Transactions shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Capital and Revenue Transactions questions
- Gupta Foods Ltd. spent Rs 6,00,000 on a heavy advertising campaign to launch a new brand, and the benefit is expected to last 5 years. If it…
- Gupta Textiles bought a second-hand machine for Rs 1,50,000. It paid Rs 12,000 for repairs needed to make it workable, Rs 5,000 for transpor…
- Which of the following items is most appropriately treated as deferred revenue expenditure?
- Which of the following is an example of capital expenditure for a trading firm?
- Nair & Sons had the following receipts in a year: sale of goods Rs 9,00,000; loan from a bank Rs 2,00,000; sale of old machinery (book value…
- Kiran Pharma Ltd. incurred Rs 8,00,000 on a major advertising campaign on 1 April 2024, treated as deferred revenue expenditure to be writte…