ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Audit and Assurance (International) · Professional appointments
Halden Partners has 14 audit partners. The firm's leadership wants to assign responsibilities under ISQM 1. The senior partner proposes that she be ultimately responsible for the system of quality management, and that the operational responsibility for the monitoring and remediation process be given to a newly qualified manager, Raj, who has no firm authority, on the basis that the senior partner will sign off the outcomes. Which statement is correct?
The proposal is not acceptable. ISQM 1 requires those given operational responsibility for areas like monitoring and remediation to have sufficient experience, knowledge, influence, authority and time. Giving the role to a junior manager without authority fails this, even with senior partner sign-off.
- AThe proposal is acceptable because ultimate responsibility remains with the senior partner
- BThe proposal is acceptable if Raj reports to the senior partner annually
- CThe proposal is not acceptable because ISQM 1 requires the individual assigned operational responsibility for monitoring and remediation to have sufficient and appropriate experience, influence and authority, and timeCorrect
- DThe proposal is not acceptable because ISQM 1 requires operational responsibility to be held by the engagement quality reviewer
Explanation
ISQM 1 requires the firm to assign operational responsibility for the system and for specific aspects such as monitoring and remediation to individuals with appropriate experience, knowledge, influence, authority and time. A manager lacking authority does not meet this, and senior partner sign-off does not cure that. Operational responsibility is not tied to the engagement quality reviewer.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Professional appointments shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Professional appointments questions
- Marlow LLP is the auditor of Corvin plc, a listed entity. Corvin's board wishes to dismiss Marlow before the end of its term because of a di…
- Marlowe LLP is considering accepting appointment as auditor of Tidewater Ltd. Before accepting, Marlowe's partner learns that Tidewater's pr…
- Zephyr & Co is asked to accept appointment as auditor of Brightwell Ltd, replacing Harlow LLP. Before accepting the nomination, what should …
- Tarn & Co is the auditor of Lowell Ltd. The directors tell Tarn & Co they intend to propose its removal because it has challenged the revenu…
- Mallory & Co audits Kestrel Foods plc and has issued an engagement letter for the current year. Nothing has changed in Kestrel's circumstanc…
- Pinecrest & Co is auditor of Ridley Ltd. A close family member of the audit engagement partner has just been appointed as chief financial of…