Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Audit and Assurance (International) · Professional liability

Harlow & Co, audit firm, is negotiating the engagement letter for a new audit client, Zenith Ltd. The client's finance director suggests adding a clause that would remove the firm's liability entirely, even for negligent audit work. Which statement best describes the position under the usual legal approach in most jurisdictions?

A clause removing all auditor liability for negligence is generally unenforceable, because company law in many jurisdictions makes such exclusions void. Signature by the finance director or a lower fee does not change this, as statute overrides contractual terms in this area.

  1. ASuch a clause is generally unenforceable because liability for negligence to the audited company cannot be excluded entirely where the law prohibits itCorrect
  2. BSuch a clause is valid provided the finance director signs the engagement letter
  3. CSuch a clause is valid because the engagement letter is a contract and contract terms always override statute
  4. DSuch a clause is valid if the audit fee is reduced accordingly

Explanation

In many jurisdictions, including those following the UK approach, statute makes void any provision exempting an auditor from liability for negligence in relation to the audit of the company. Signature by management or a fee reduction does not cure the invalidity. Contract terms do not override mandatory law.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Professional liability shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Professional liability questions