CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Applications, Petitions and Appeals under Companies Act, 2013
Himalaya Foods Pvt Ltd drafts an application seeking the Tribunal's approval for a matter. The draft prays that the approval be granted 'without any conditions whatsoever'. The company's counsel advises that the prayer should recognise the Tribunal's power under the Act. Which statement correctly reflects that power?
The Tribunal may grant approval, sanction, consent, direction or exemption subject to such conditions, limitations or restrictions as it thinks fit, unless a provision says otherwise. It may also withdraw the relief if a condition is contravened, so a drafter should not assume unconditional relief.
- AThe Tribunal must grant approval exactly as prayed and cannot attach conditions
- BThe Tribunal may grant approval subject to such conditions, limitations or restrictions as it thinks fit, unless the provision says otherwiseCorrect
- CThe Tribunal may impose conditions only for exemptions, not for approvals or directions
- DThe Tribunal may impose conditions but cannot withdraw the approval even if they are breached
Explanation
Section 459(1) lets the Central Government or Tribunal accord approval, sanction, consent, confirmation, recognition, direction or exemption subject to conditions it thinks fit, absent contrary provision. It may also rescind or withdraw the approval on contravention of a condition. So a prayer demanding unconditional approval ignores this power, and the other options misstate its scope.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Applications, Petitions and Appeals under Companies Act, 2013 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Applications, Petitions and Appeals under Companies Act, 2013 questions
- Epsilon Ltd seeks compounding of a default for which the maximum fine is Rs 5 lakh. An investigation against the company under the Act is pe…
- Ganga Infra Ltd prepares an application asking the Tribunal for a direction on a matter, and separately seeks an exemption on another matter…
- Mr Raghavan, a retired Judge of the Supreme Court, is proposed as Chairperson of the Appellate Tribunal, and Mr Iyer, who has been a Judicia…
- In drafting the memorandum of appeal against a pre-commencement winding-up order, which approach correctly reflects Section 303?
- Bharat Steels Ltd. lost before the NCLAT. Its board wants to appeal to the Supreme Court contending that the NCLAT wrongly appreciated the f…
- Orion Pharma Ltd petitions the NCLT for an approval. The Tribunal grants it but imposes conditions. Later, Orion breaches one condition. Whi…