Skip to content

IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Business Management · Communicating strategy; culture and structure in decision making; strategy case studies

Himalaya Pensions, with a strongly centralised decision structure, plans to enter a fast-changing digital annuity market where local conditions differ widely across states and quick responses matter. The board asks a consultant to recommend an approach. Which recommendation is most consistent with strategy theory on structure and decision making?

The best recommendation is greater decentralisation within clear guardrails: local teams respond quickly to varied state markets, while the centre retains control of risk appetite and reporting. Full centralisation is too slow, and removing central oversight would expose a financial firm to uncontrolled risk.

  1. ARetain full centralisation because it guarantees consistency, even if responses are slow
  2. BMove to greater decentralisation with clear guardrails on risk limits and reporting, so local teams can respond quickly while the centre keeps control of risk appetiteCorrect
  3. CDecentralise fully and remove all central risk oversight to maximise speed
  4. DOutsource all decisions to an external consultant
  5. Abolish middle management and give every employee equal authority over strategy

Explanation

Fast-changing, locally varied markets favour decentralised decisions near the customer. For a financial business, though, risk appetite and governance must stay central. Full decentralisation without oversight risks uncontrolled risk, while full centralisation is too slow.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Communicating strategy; culture and structure in decision making; strategy case studies shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Communicating strategy; culture and structure in decision making; strategy case studies questions