CA Foundation · Business Laws · The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Imran's cheque for Rs 1,50,000 in favour of Joseph was dishonoured for insufficient funds. Joseph sent a valid notice, and Imran did not pay within 15 days. Under Section 138, what is the maximum punishment on conviction?
Imran can be punished with imprisonment up to two years, or a fine up to twice the cheque amount, or both. For a Rs 1,50,000 cheque, the maximum fine is Rs 3,00,000. The other options misstate the term or the fine.
- AImprisonment up to 2 years, or a fine up to twice the cheque amount, or bothCorrect
- BImprisonment up to 6 months, or a fine up to the cheque amount, or both
- CImprisonment up to 5 years only, with no fine
- DOnly a fine of Rs 1,000
Explanation
On conviction under Section 138, the drawer may be punished with imprisonment up to two years, or with a fine up to twice the cheque amount, or with both. Here twice the cheque amount would be Rs 3,00,000. The other options understate or overstate the penalty.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 questions
- Nisha Textiles, a company, issued a cheque that was dishonoured and Section 138 was attracted. Which statement about liability under Section…
- Rohit Mehra, a trader in Surat, draws a bill of exchange on Sunil Traders, Jaipur, payable '30 days after sight'. Sunil Traders sees the bil…
- Nisha draws a cheque for Rs 25,000 on her account with a bank in Pune in favour of Omkar. Before presenting it, Omkar cancels the cheque by …
- A cheque payable to Mehul Traders is crossed specially with the name of 'Canara Bank'. The drawee bank, HDFC Bank, pays it across the counte…
- A bill for Rs 1,00,000 is payable to the order of Charu Enterprises. Charu endorses it: 'Pay Dinesh Rs 40,000 only', and delivers it to Dine…
- Suresh Gupta received a demand notice on 5 April after his cheque to Lakshmi Enterprises bounced. He did not pay within the statutory period…