Skip to content

IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Economic Modelling · Ruin theory

In a discrete-time surplus process U_n = u + cn − S_n, where S_n is the sum of n independent annual aggregate claims, which statement about the probability of ruin by time N (finite horizon) is correct?

The finite-horizon ruin probability is never larger than the infinite-horizon one, because ruin by time N is a subset of ruin at any time. It increases as the horizon lengthens and falls with higher initial surplus.

  1. AIt is never larger than the probability of ruin over an infinite horizonCorrect
  2. BIt is never smaller than the probability of ruin over an infinite horizon
  3. CIt is independent of the initial surplus u
  4. DIt decreases as the horizon N is lengthened
  5. It equals the probability that U_N alone is negative

Explanation

Ruin within N years is an event contained in ruin within an infinite horizon, so the finite-horizon ruin probability cannot exceed the infinite-horizon one. It rises (weakly) as N lengthens, and it depends on u. Ruin by N counts any year up to N with negative surplus, not only the final year.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Ruin theory shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Ruin theory questions