CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Geographical Indications
In a GI infringement suit, the High Court has stayed the trial under section 57 pending rectification proceedings. The plaintiff, Nilgiri Tea Board, fears the defendant will keep selling the disputed goods during the stay and asks for an injunction and the appointment of a receiver. Which statement is correct?
The court can still make interlocutory orders during the stay, including an injunction, directing accounts, appointing a receiver or attaching property. Section 57(5) expressly preserves these powers, so the stay of the trial does not leave the plaintiff without interim protection.
- AThe court may still pass such interlocutory orders, including an injunction or appointing a receiver, during the stayCorrect
- BThe court has no power to pass any order until the stay ends
- COnly the Registrar may grant an injunction during the stay
- DThe court may grant an injunction but may not direct accounts to be kept or attach property
Explanation
Section 57(5) says that a stay of the suit does not preclude the court from making any interlocutory order, including orders granting an injunction, directing accounts to be kept, appointing a receiver or attaching property, during the stay. So the last option is wrong because accounts and attachment are expressly included.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Geographical Indications shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Geographical Indications questions
- A trader sells packaged tea in a bottle-shaped container with a stopper, band and label. A dispute arises over whether these items form part…
- In a GI infringement suit, the defendant was given three months to seek rectification of the plaintiff's registration but made no applicatio…
- In an infringement suit over a registered GI, the defendant, Mehta Traders, pleads that the plaintiff's registration is invalid. No rectific…
- In an infringement suit, the defendant, Sethi Exports, wants to challenge the plaintiff's GI registration as invalid and files a rectificati…
- In a suit for infringement of a registered GI, the defendant, Ravi Foods, proves that when it began using the indication it was unaware and …
- Himalaya Teas Pvt Ltd uses the name of an unregistered geographical indication for its tea. A rival who is not entitled to use it sells tea …