FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Regression Diagnostics
In a linear regression estimated by OLS, the error variance rises with the size of an explanatory variable, but the model is otherwise correctly specified and the errors are uncorrelated with the regressors. Which statement about the OLS estimators is correct?
OLS coefficients remain unbiased and consistent under heteroskedasticity because the errors are still uncorrelated with the regressors. What fails is the conventional standard error formula, which assumes constant variance, so hypothesis tests and confidence intervals become unreliable unless robust standard errors are used.
- AThe coefficient estimates are biased, and the standard errors are too small
- BThe coefficient estimates remain unbiased and consistent, but the usual standard errors are unreliableCorrect
- CThe coefficient estimates are biased but the usual standard errors remain valid
- DThe coefficient estimates are inconsistent, and R-squared must equal zero
Explanation
Heteroskedasticity does not violate the exogeneity condition, so OLS slope estimates stay unbiased and consistent. However, the conventional standard error formula assumes constant variance, so t-tests and confidence intervals become unreliable. Options claiming bias confuse heteroskedasticity with omitted variables or endogeneity.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Regression Diagnostics shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Regression Diagnostics questions
- A risk analyst estimates a regression of daily portfolio returns on a factor and finds residuals with a first-order autocorrelation of 0.50.…
- The true model is Y = 1.0 + 2.0*X1 + 3.0*X2 + e. An analyst omits X2 and regresses Y on X1 only. In the sample, Cov(X1, X2) = 0.8 and Var(X1…
- In a multiple regression of monthly fund excess returns on three risk factors, an analyst finds that two of the explanatory variables have a…
- In a multiple regression, the auxiliary regression of explanatory variable X1 on the other explanatory variables yields an R-squared of 0.90…
- A risk analyst's regression of portfolio returns on two highly correlated factors (sample correlation 0.97) is used only to forecast returns…
- An analyst regresses squared residuals from an OLS model on the explanatory variables as part of a Breusch-Pagan test. The auxiliary regress…