FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Madoff: A Riot of Red Flags
In a Ponzi scheme such as Madoff's, which mechanism best explains how the operator can keep paying redemptions to investors while no genuine trading profits are generated?
The operator uses cash from new investors to pay redemptions and reported returns to earlier investors. No real trading profit supports the payouts, so the scheme survives only while inflows cover withdrawals and collapses when redemptions exceed new money, as happened during the 2008 crisis.
- AHedging the portfolio with offsetting option positions
- BUsing cash from new investor inflows to pay earlier investors' redemptions and reported returnsCorrect
- CLending client securities to prime brokers to earn fees
- DReinvesting dividends from a diversified equity portfolio
Explanation
A Ponzi scheme depends on new money to meet payouts to existing investors. It becomes insolvent when redemption requests exceed new inflows, as occurred in late 2008. The other choices describe legitimate sources of return that were not actually generating the reported profits.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Madoff: A Riot of Red Flags shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Madoff: A Riot of Red Flags questions
- A pension fund's due diligence team reviews a hedge fund manager that reports smooth monthly returns, uses a tiny unknown audit firm, and se…
- After Madoff, a fund of funds revises its due diligence policy. Which revision would most directly address the structural weakness that regu…
- An analyst notes that a manager claims to buy a basket of large-cap equities and hedge with index options, with reported monthly returns tha…
- A fund-of-funds analyst reviewing a hedge fund notes that its multi-billion-dollar portfolio is audited by a three-person accounting firm op…
- A due diligence analyst reviews a fund that reports steady monthly returns of about 1% with almost no down months over 15 years, attributed …
- Which regulatory reform theme is most consistent with lessons drawn from the Madoff case?