Skip to content

CS Professional · Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Law and Practice · Resolution Strategies (Elective 7.5)

In a pre-packaged insolvency resolution process of Vindhya Pharma Ltd, the corporate debtor's base resolution plan pays operational creditors in full but gives financial creditors only 70% of their confirmed claims. The committee of creditors approves it by 70% of voting shares and the promoters retain full control. Which statement is correct under section 54K?

The committee may approve the plan, but it must record reasons for approving it without promoter dilution. Operational creditors are unimpaired, so competing plans are not compulsory, and 70% exceeds the 66% requirement. Impairment of financial claims triggers the dilution-or-reasons rule in section 54K(14).

  1. AThe committee may approve it, but because financial claims are impaired it must record reasons for approving a plan with no promoter dilutionCorrect
  2. BThe base plan is invalid because any impairment of claims bars its approval
  3. CThe resolution professional must invite competing plans because financial creditors' claims are impaired
  4. DThe Adjudicating Authority may approve the plan without any committee vote because the operational creditors are paid in full

Explanation

Under section 54K(4) the committee may approve the base plan if it does not impair operational creditors' claims, which holds here. The 70% vote exceeds the 66% minimum under section 54K(13). Since the plan impairs claims, section 54K(14) lets the committee require promoter dilution, and if the plan has no dilution the committee must record reasons before approval. Competing plans are mandatory only if the base plan is not approved or impairs operational creditors' claims.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Resolution Strategies (Elective 7.5) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Resolution Strategies (Elective 7.5) questions