CS Professional · Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation · Preparation and Execution of Arbitral Award
In an arbitration, the tribunal fixed a deposit of Rs 4,00,000 for the claim, payable in equal shares by Nair Ltd and Iyer Ltd. Nair Ltd paid Rs 2,00,000. Iyer Ltd did not pay its share, and Nair Ltd also declined to pay Iyer's share. Which is correct under Section 38?
The tribunal may suspend or terminate the arbitral proceedings in respect of the claim. Section 38(2) lets the other party pay a defaulter's share, but where neither party pays that share, suspension or termination becomes available. On termination, unspent deposits must be accounted for and returned.
- AThe tribunal may suspend or terminate the proceedings in respect of the claim, since neither party paid the unpaid shareCorrect
- BThe tribunal must proceed and recover Iyer's share from the award
- CThe proceedings terminate automatically with no tribunal decision
- DThe tribunal may only refund Nair's Rs 2,00,000 and has no power to suspend
Explanation
Section 38(2) makes the deposit payable in equal shares, and the other party may pay a defaulting party's share. If the other party also does not pay, the tribunal may suspend or terminate the proceedings for that claim or counter-claim. Termination is discretionary, not automatic. On termination the tribunal must account for deposits and return any unexpended balance.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Preparation and Execution of Arbitral Award shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Preparation and Execution of Arbitral Award questions
- An arbitral tribunal sitting under an agreement fixing Pune as the place of arbitration under section 20 conducts hearings partly in Mumbai …
- Tribunal delivers an award to Raman Pharma and Delta Chemicals on 1 March. It decided claims A and B but did not deal with claim C, which wa…
- A tribunal seated at Hyderabad by agreement between Desai Motors Ltd and Khan Auto Parts passes an award that carries no signature date and …
- An award dated 1 March directs Gupta Engineering Ltd to pay Rs 5,00,000 to Mehta Infra Ltd. The award is silent on post-award interest. Unde…
- Rao Textiles Ltd and Sundaram Dyes Pvt Ltd refer a payment dispute to a sole arbitrator. Their arbitration agreement is silent on interest. …
- Mehta Exports Ltd and Sundaram Traders agreed in their arbitration clause that the tribunal need not give reasons for its award. The sole ar…