CA Intermediate · Auditing and Ethics · Audit of Items of Financial Statements
In auditing Narmada Engineering Ltd, the auditor finds that the company has capitalised Rs 40 lakh of repair and maintenance expenses that merely restore the existing machinery to its original working condition without increasing its future benefits or standard of performance. Which audit conclusion is correct?
The expenditure merely maintains existing performance and is therefore revenue in nature. Capitalising it overstates both fixed assets and profit. The auditor should ask management to correct it and, if the material misstatement remains uncorrected, modify the audit opinion.
- AThe capitalisation is correct because all expenditure on machinery is capital in nature
- BThe expenditure should be treated as revenue expense, so profit and fixed assets are overstated and the auditor should seek correction or modify the opinionCorrect
- CThe expenditure should be shown as a contingent asset in the notes
- DThe item affects only classification in the cash flow statement and not the profit
Explanation
Expenditure that only maintains the previously assessed standard of performance is a revenue expense under the accounting standard on PPE. Capitalising it overstates assets and profit by Rs 40 lakh. The auditor requests an adjustment and, if management refuses and the effect is material, modifies the opinion.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Audit of Items of Financial Statements shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Audit of Items of Financial Statements questions
- During the audit of Himalaya Steels Ltd, the auditor finds that the company has accounted for a land purchase of Rs 2 crore in the name of i…
- Ganga Steel Ltd's Property, Plant and Equipment register shows a machine bought on 1 April at Rs 40 lakh. The auditor notes that on 10 April…
- During the audit of Mehra Engineering Pvt Ltd, the auditor could not attend the physical inventory count on 31 March because she was appoint…
- In auditing Sagar Infra Ltd, the auditor finds that a plant costing Rs 80 lakh was acquired during the year. The invoice is in the name of a…
- While auditing Bharat Engineering Ltd, the auditor finds that a plant purchased during the year for Rs 80 lakh was recorded in the fixed ass…
- While auditing Kaveri Agro Ltd for the year ended 31 March, the auditor attends the physical verification of inventory on 28 March, three da…