CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) - Principles and Practice · Conceptual Framework of Corporate Governance
In India, the first major push for governance reform came from a voluntary code framed by an industry body in 1998, followed by a SEBI committee chaired by Kumar Mangalam Birla whose recommendations led to a mandatory listing clause for listed companies. Which pairing is correct?
The CII's Desirable Corporate Governance Code of 1998 was voluntary, while the SEBI Kumar Mangalam Birla Committee recommendations were implemented through Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement, making governance norms mandatory for listed companies. Later committees such as Naresh Chandra and Narayana Murthy refined these norms.
- ACII Desirable Corporate Governance Code, 1998 voluntary; Birla Committee led to Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement, mandatory for listed companiesCorrect
- BSEBI Birla Committee 1998 voluntary; CII code led to Clause 49
- CNaresh Chandra Committee led to Clause 49 in 1998
- DNarayana Murthy Committee drafted the CII code in 1998
Explanation
The CII code of 1998 was voluntary. SEBI's Birla Committee (1999-2000) recommendations were implemented as Clause 49 in the listing agreement, making them mandatory. The other options misattribute the bodies or the sequence; Narayana Murthy and Naresh Chandra came later.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Conceptual Framework of Corporate Governance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Conceptual Framework of Corporate Governance questions
- Himalaya Foods Ltd's board adopts a policy saying that, in decisions, it will consider only the maximisation of shareholder wealth and ignor…
- A listed Indian company's board is considering how to structure leadership. Its directors note that in the Anglo-American unitary board mode…
- Meridian Textiles Ltd is promoted by a family holding 62% of its shares. Its board has two promoter directors, a few independent directors, …
- Vindhya Cements Ltd is 70% owned by its promoter group, which also controls the CEO appointment. A fund manager argues that the usual agency…
- At the board meeting of Lakshya Infra Ltd, directors disagree about whether the managing director should also chair the board. A governance-…
- Bharat Cement Ltd plans a new plant. The board consults local villagers, employees, lenders and suppliers, and accepts that long-term value …