CS Professional · Internal and Forensic Audit · Internal Audit of Specific Functions
In reviewing the purchase function of Narmada Steels Ltd, which audit step best tests whether purchases are made at competitive prices?
The auditor should compare prices actually paid with competitive quotations, rate contracts and prevailing market prices. This shows whether the company bought economically and whether favoured vendors received inflated rates, which is central to a value-for-money review of procurement.
- AComparing prices paid with quotations, rate contracts and market ratesCorrect
- BVerifying the physical existence of fixed assets
- CChecking the share transfer register
- DReviewing the attendance of directors
Explanation
Price reasonableness is assessed by comparing actual purchase prices with competitive quotations, approved rate contracts and prevailing market rates. The other steps relate to different areas.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Internal Audit of Specific Functions shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Internal Audit of Specific Functions questions
- An internal auditor wants to confirm that the production version of an accounting application is the same program version that was formally …
- An internal auditor wants to confirm that goods for which Sundaram Engineering Ltd was invoiced were actually received. Which document shoul…
- An internal auditor at Bharat Logistics Ltd notices that salaries of 12 employees who resigned over the past six months continued to be cred…
- An internal auditor reviewing the cash management of Himalaya Pharma Ltd wants to detect possible lapping of receivables by a cashier. Which…
- While walking through the Pune plant of Sahyadri Auto Ltd., an internal auditor notices three CNC machines in use that cannot be found in th…
- Which internal audit procedure best verifies that the cost of a newly capitalised building at Himalaya Foods Ltd. is properly stated?