CS Executive · Corporate Accounting and Financial Management · Capital Budgeting
In the capital budgeting process, which of the following is the correct logical order of the stages?
The logical order is identifying investment opportunities, estimating cash flows and evaluating proposals, selecting and approving projects, implementing them, and finally reviewing performance against forecasts. Proposals must exist before they are evaluated, and review comes only after implementation.
- AEvaluation of proposals, identification of opportunities, implementation, selection
- BIdentification of investment opportunities, estimation of cash flows and evaluation, selection and approval, implementation and performance reviewCorrect
- CImplementation, selection, evaluation, identification
- DSelection and approval, identification, performance review, evaluation
Explanation
Firms first generate or identify proposals, then estimate cash flows and appraise them, then select and approve the best, then implement and finally review actual performance against estimates. The other orders place stages before the proposals exist or after the project is done.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Capital Budgeting shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Capital Budgeting questions
- In the capital budgeting process, which sequence of stages is the most logical?
- Sundaram Ltd. is evaluating a project with an initial outlay of ₹1,00,000 and a single expected cash inflow of ₹1,32,000 at the end of year …
- Anand Ltd. invests Rs 5,00,000 in a project with nil scrap value. Average annual accounting profit after depreciation and tax is Rs 75,000. …
- Ananya Textiles is evaluating a project with an initial outlay of Rs 2,00,000 that gives a single cash inflow of Rs 2,42,000 at the end of y…
- Mahalaxmi Textiles buys a machine for Rs 12,00,000 that generates uniform annual cash inflows of Rs 3,00,000 after tax. What is the payback …
- In capital budgeting, the certainty-equivalent approach to handling risk works by: