IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Economic Modelling · Stochastic models for security prices
In the Ito multiplication rules used with Ito's lemma, which set of results is correct for small dt?
The standard rules are (dW)² = dt, dW·dt = 0 and (dt)² = 0. Because the squared Brownian increment is of order dt, it contributes a second-order term in Ito's lemma, while the other products are negligible.
- A(dW)² = dt, dW·dt = 0, (dt)² = 0Correct
- B(dW)² = 0, dW·dt = dt, (dt)² = 0
- C(dW)² = dt, dW·dt = dt, (dt)² = dt
- D(dW)² = dt², dW·dt = 0, (dt)² = 0
- (dW)² = dt, dW·dt = 0, (dt)² = dt
Explanation
Brownian increments have variance dt, so (dW)² behaves like dt. Cross term dW·dt and (dt)² are of higher order and vanish. This yields the extra second-order term in Ito's lemma.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Stochastic models for security prices shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Stochastic models for security prices questions
- A non-dividend-paying share trades at Rs 100. Under Black-Scholes, for a European call with strike Rs 100, maturity 1 year, risk-free force …
- A non-dividend-paying share trades at Rs 100. A European call with strike Rs 100 and one year to expiry is priced under Black-Scholes with a…
- In a discrete-time model for a share price, the log-return over each year is assumed to be independent and normally distributed with the sam…
- A stock price S(t) follows geometric Brownian motion dS = μS dt + σS dW. Which statement about the process is correct?
- A share price S_t follows geometric Brownian motion dS = S(μ dt + σ dW). Which statement about S_t is correct?
- Which statement about a mean-reverting Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model for an interest rate dr = a(mu - r)dt + sigma dW (a > 0) is correct?