IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Economic Modelling · Models of the term structure of interest rates
In the Vasicek model dr = a(μ − r)dt + σ dW, which statement about the short rate r is correct?
In the Vasicek model the short rate is normally distributed because the noise is additive and the drift is linear, so negative rates occur with positive probability. Non-negativity belongs to square-root models like CIR, not Vasicek.
- AThe short rate cannot become negative because the volatility is proportional to r
- BThe short rate is normally distributed and can become negative with positive probabilityCorrect
- CThe short rate is lognormally distributed at every future time
- DThe short rate drifts away from μ when a > 0
- The short rate has constant variance only if a = 0 and σ = 0
Explanation
Vasicek has additive Gaussian noise and mean reversion, so r(t) is normally distributed. A normal variable takes negative values with positive probability. The option claiming volatility proportional to r describes CIR-type behaviour, not Vasicek.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Models of the term structure of interest rates shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Models of the term structure of interest rates questions
- In a two-factor Gaussian model of the yield curve, the first factor typically produces parallel shifts and the second factor produces change…
- In the context of the term structure of interest rates, which statement correctly describes the par yield for a given term?
- In a continuous-time term structure framework, the instantaneous forward rate f(t,T) is best described as:
- According to the liquidity preference theory, the forward rate for a future period is:
- An insurer calibrates a Vasicek model to historical monthly short-rate data and then uses it to value a long-dated option embedded in a prod…
- Principal component analysis of historical yield curve changes typically finds that the first principal component is best interpreted as: