CA Final · Advanced Auditing, Assurance and Professional Ethics · Quality Control
Kapoor & Co. is drafting its quality control manual. The managing partner says the firm will perform an EQCR for listed-company audits and will decide case by case, without any written criteria, whether to perform it for other engagements. Which conclusion is correct under SQC 1?
The approach is deficient. SQC 1 requires an EQCR for listed-entity audits and also requires the firm to set out criteria for evaluating all other engagements to decide whether an EQCR is needed, and to apply it to engagements meeting those criteria. Case-by-case decisions without criteria do not comply.
- AThe approach is acceptable because only listed-entity audits need an EQCR and no criteria are needed for others
- BThe approach is deficient because the firm must set out criteria against which all other engagements are evaluated to determine whether an EQCR is neededCorrect
- CThe approach is acceptable if the managing partner records reasons after each engagement
- DThe approach is deficient because EQCR must be performed on every engagement the firm undertakes
Explanation
SQC 1 requires an EQCR for all audits of listed entities. It also requires the firm to set out criteria against which all other audits, reviews and assurance or related services engagements are evaluated, and to require an EQCR for those meeting the criteria. Option D is wrong because EQCR is not required for every engagement, only listed audits and those meeting the criteria.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Quality Control shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Quality Control questions
- Mehta & Associates, a CA firm, is auditing the financial statements of Sundaram Foods Ltd, a listed company. The engagement partner proposes…
- Sharma & Associates, a chartered accountant firm, is the auditor of Meridian Textiles Ltd, a company whose shares are listed on a recognised…
- During the audit of Bharat Agro Pvt Ltd, the engagement partner repeatedly consulted the designated EQCR, Mr. Iyer, and the consultations be…
- During the audit of Kaveri Textiles Ltd (listed), the engagement partner consulted the engagement quality control reviewer, Mr. Anand, on se…
- Kapoor & Co. is auditing Veda Textiles Ltd, a listed entity. The firm's manual sets criteria for deciding which non-listed audits need an en…
- Iyer & Partners is drafting its quality control manual. A reviewer's file for the audit of Ganga Pharma Ltd (listed) states only that the re…