CS Executive · Company Law and Practice · Compromise, Arrangement and Amalgamations - Concepts
Kapoor Pharma Ltd, a listed company, merges into Iyer Labs Pvt Ltd, an unlisted company, under a Section 232 scheme. Which statement correctly reflects the Act's provisions on this?
The transferee stays unlisted until it becomes listed, and shareholders who opt out are paid under a price formula or valuation. Under Section 232(3)(h), the amount per share cannot be less than what SEBI regulations specify. There is no automatic listing.
- AThe transferee becomes listed automatically on the sanction of the scheme
- BThe transferee remains unlisted until it becomes listed, and opting-out shareholders are paid a value not less than what SEBI regulations specifyCorrect
- CThe Tribunal cannot provide for opting-out shareholders in such a case
- DOpting-out shareholders are paid the face value of their shares
Explanation
Section 232(3)(h) provides that the unlisted transferee remains unlisted until it becomes listed. Shareholders who opt out must be paid by a pre-determined price formula or after valuation, and the amount per share must not be less than what SEBI has specified. Automatic listing or face value payment finds no support.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Compromise, Arrangement and Amalgamations - Concepts shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Compromise, Arrangement and Amalgamations - Concepts questions
- Kaveri Foods Ltd has received a Tribunal order to hold a meeting on a scheme. The notice of the meeting is sent to the members. Within what …
- Mehta Foods Ltd's scheme of arrangement was sanctioned by the Tribunal and includes a takeover offer. The scheme also needs to treat dissent…
- A scheme of amalgamation sanctioned by the Tribunal reached Zenith Ltd on 1 March. Within what time must Zenith file a certified copy of the…
- Under a scheme sanctioned by the Tribunal under Section 232, Gupta Engineering Ltd (transferor) merges into Rao Industries Ltd (transferee).…
- While sanctioning a scheme for Yamuna Cement Ltd, the Tribunal feels one clause may cause practical problems. Under section 231, what can it…
- Mehta Steels Ltd's sanctioned scheme requires payment of creditors in instalments. The Tribunal finds the scheme cannot be implemented satis…