Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Reporting (International) · Revenue

Kappa Co agreed to supply 1,000 units at $50 each, delivered over six months. After 400 units were delivered, the customer and Kappa agreed to add 200 more units at $40 each. The standalone selling price of the units at that date is $45. How should Kappa account for the modification?

Kappa treats the modification as a termination of the old contract and creation of a new one, applied prospectively. The extra units are distinct but priced below standalone selling price, so it is not a separate contract. Remaining consideration of $38,000 is allocated across the 800 undelivered units.

  1. AAs a separate contract, because the additional units are priced at $40 each
  2. BAs a termination of the old contract and creation of a new contract, with remaining consideration reallocated prospectivelyCorrect
  3. CAs a cumulative catch-up adjustment to revenue recognised to date
  4. DAs a separate contract only if the customer pays in advance

Explanation

A modification is a separate contract only if it adds distinct goods and the price reflects their standalone selling price; here $40 is below $45, so it fails. The remaining units are distinct from those already delivered, so the modification is treated prospectively as if the old contract were terminated. The remaining consideration (600 x $50 + 200 x $40 = $38,000) is spread over 800 units, giving $47.50 per unit. A catch-up applies only when the remaining goods are not distinct.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Revenue shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Revenue questions