ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Reporting (International) · Income taxes
Kappa Ltd recognised a revaluation gain of $200,000 on land in other comprehensive income. The tax rate is 25% and the gain creates a taxable temporary difference. Which presentation is required under IAS 12 for the related deferred tax?
The $50,000 deferred tax (25% of $200,000) should be charged in other comprehensive income against the revaluation surplus. IAS 12 requires tax on items recognised outside profit or loss to be recognised in the same place as the underlying item.
- ADeferred tax expense of $50,000 in profit or loss
- BDeferred tax of $50,000 debited to other comprehensive income, within the revaluation surplus movementCorrect
- CDeferred tax of $50,000 deducted directly from the carrying amount of the land
- DNo deferred tax, because land is not depreciated
Explanation
IAS 12 requires tax to be recognised outside profit or loss when it relates to items recognised outside profit or loss. The revaluation gain was in OCI, so deferred tax of 25% x $200,000 = $50,000 is also charged to OCI. Charging profit or loss would mismatch the tax with the item that caused it. Non-depreciation of land does not remove the temporary difference.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Income taxes shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Income taxes questions
- At 31 December 20X5 Delta Co's financial statements showed a current tax liability estimate of $240,000 for the year. In 20X6 the tax author…
- Corvin Co has an acquired subsidiary. On acquisition, a brand was fair valued at $12m in the consolidated financial statements, but its tax …
- Lumen plc's profit before tax is $800,000 and its total tax expense is $168,000. The applicable tax rate is 25%. The only reconciling items …
- Finance director of Lumen Co proposes recognising a deferred tax asset for tax losses by using an optimistic profit forecast that the board …
- Ostra Co has an uncertain tax position: it claimed a deduction that the tax authority may reject. Ostra concludes it is probable that the au…
- Zeta Co has unused tax losses of $200,000 carried forward. Zeta has no taxable temporary differences and no history of profits, and no convi…