Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Performance Management · Management reports

Karlo Retail's board receives a monthly dashboard. Store managers complain that their reports include allocated head office costs of $400,000 that they cannot influence, and that their bonuses fall because of it. Which change best improves the usefulness of the store-level report for performance evaluation?

Separate controllable results from non-controllable allocated head office costs so managers are judged only on what they can influence. This gives fairer appraisal and better motivation. Allocating more cost or removing information would worsen accountability and feedback.

  1. AReport controllable results separately from non-controllable allocated costs, so managers are assessed on items they can influenceCorrect
  2. BRemove all cost information from the store reports
  3. CAllocate even more head office cost to stores to increase cost awareness
  4. DReport only to the board and stop reporting to stores

Explanation

Managers should be held accountable for controllable items. Separating controllable performance from allocated head office costs gives fairer evaluation and motivates managers. Adding more allocations worsens the problem, and removing costs or reporting removes useful feedback.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Management reports shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Management reports questions