CMA Final · Strategic Cost Management · Back Flush Accounting
Kaveri Components uses backflush accounting with trigger points at purchase of materials and completion of units. Standard cost per unit is Rs 150 (materials Rs 90, conversion Rs 60). Materials purchased Rs 5,00,000; actual conversion cost Rs 3,40,000; units completed 5,500; units sold 5,000. What is the cost of goods sold at standard, and what is the conversion cost under-applied/over-applied?
Cost of goods sold is 5,000 units at Rs 150, which is Rs 7,50,000. Applied conversion is 5,500 x Rs 60 = Rs 3,30,000 against actual Rs 3,40,000, so conversion is under-applied by Rs 10,000.
- ACOGS Rs 7,50,000; conversion under-applied Rs 10,000Correct
- BCOGS Rs 8,25,000; conversion under-applied Rs 10,000
- CCOGS Rs 7,50,000; conversion over-applied Rs 10,000
- DCOGS Rs 7,50,000; conversion under-applied Rs 40,000
Explanation
COGS = 5,000 x Rs 150 = Rs 7,50,000. Conversion applied on completion = 5,500 x Rs 60 = Rs 3,30,000. Actual Rs 3,40,000 exceeds applied by Rs 10,000, so under-applied. Option B uses units completed for COGS, which is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Back Flush Accounting shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Back Flush Accounting questions
- Which statement about back flush accounting is most appropriate at this level of study?
- Which feature best describes a backflush costing system compared with a traditional sequential costing system?
- Tulsi Motors uses backflush costing with triggers at material purchase and at completion of finished goods. Standard cost is ₹600 per unit (…
- Bharat Gears Ltd applies back flush accounting with one trigger at completion. Standard cost per unit is material Rs 600 and conversion Rs 4…
- Which statement about back flush accounting is correct in a JIT environment?
- Narmada Gears Ltd uses a two-trigger back flush system: material purchases are debited to Raw-in-Process, and completed units are back-flush…