CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST
Kaveri Metals Ltd. was allowed to compound an offence under clause (c) of section 132(1) last year. This year it is accused of another offence under clause (d) of section 132(1) and applies for compounding. What is the position under section 138?
Compounding is not available. Section 138 bars anyone already allowed to compound once for any offence in clauses (a) to (f), (h), (i) and (l) of section 132(1). Both clause (c) and clause (d) fall in this group, so the second application fails.
- ACompounding is allowed because the earlier offence was under a different clause
- BCompounding is allowed if the company pays 100% of the tax involved
- CCompounding is not available, because a person already allowed to compound once for offences in clauses (a) to (f), (h), (i) and (l) is barredCorrect
- DCompounding is allowed only if the first compounding was before prosecution
Explanation
The proviso to section 138(1)(a) bars a person who has been allowed to compound once in respect of any offence in clauses (a) to (f), (h), (i) and (l) of section 132(1). Clauses (c) and (d) both fall in that group, so the different clause is no escape, and the amount paid is irrelevant.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Offences and Penalties and Ethical Aspects under GST questions
- Kapoor Ltd applied for compounding, and the Commissioner granted immunity after Kapoor paid the tax, interest, penalty and the compounding a…
- Gupta Steels Ltd received the Commissioner's order in FORM GST CPD-02 allowing compounding of its offence on 10 March. It had paid the tax, …
- Ananya Traders, a Pune-based registered supplier, applied to the Commissioner for compounding of an offence under GST. The Commissioner call…
- After the Commissioner granted immunity from prosecution to Gupta Metals under Rule 162(3), it came to light that Gupta Metals had concealed…
- Deepak Agro, Indore, was granted immunity from prosecution by an order under rule 162(3) after paying tax, interest and penalty and the comp…
- Sundaram Foods Ltd. was earlier allowed to compound an offence under clause (c) of section 132(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. It is now accused o…